Addressing the ongoing smear campaign against him, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa passionately called for an end to the mudslinging and false propaganda perpetuated by certain unscrupulous media outlets. Expressing his dissatisfaction with the term "media organizations" for these entities, he instead labeled them as propaganda agencies engaged in baseless character attacks.

Premadasa's plea for accountability arose following a statement made by Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe in Parliament. He vehemently refuted the allegations circulating in these propaganda circles, specifically the claims that he would align with the UNP and the President. In a decisive declaration within the parliamentary setting, Premadasa asserted that such alliances were out of the question.

"I don’t like to use the word media organizations for them. Several propaganda agencies have come together and are claiming that Sajith will join UNP and the President. We will never join together. I am declaring that in this Parliament. Even now, I urge the media agencies which extort money not to carry out such false propaganda,” Premadasa emphasized, urging media agencies involved in extortion not to perpetuate misinformation.

This call for responsibility underscores the broader challenge of maintaining the integrity of information dissemination, emphasizing the need for ethical reporting and a halt to the damaging practice of mudslinging within the media landscape.

In conclusion, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa's impassioned plea to halt the mudslinging and false propaganda orchestrated by certain media outlets reflects a broader concern over the ethical conduct of information dissemination. Premadasa's dissatisfaction with the characterization of these entities as "media organizations" underscores the gravity of the issue, as he labels them propaganda agencies engaging in baseless character attacks.

The Opposition Leader's firm denial of allegations regarding potential political alliances, especially with the UNP and the President, was delivered with conviction in a parliamentary setting. Premadasa's declaration serves as a resolute stance against the unfounded claims circulating in these propaganda circles.

As Premadasa emphasizes the need for responsible reporting, his plea resonates beyond the confines of his personal situation, highlighting the broader challenge of maintaining integrity in media practices. The call for media agencies involved in extortion to refrain from spreading false propaganda underscores the importance of ethical journalism and the collective responsibility to uphold the truth in the public domain. In a landscape where misinformation can have far-reaching consequences, Premadasa's appeal serves as a reminder of the critical role media plays in shaping public perception and the imperative to ensure its responsible and truthful engagement.