In a recent legal proceeding, the Colombo Additional Magistrate presided over a case involving alleged credit card misuse. The case centers on a former media secretary to a government minister, who was accused of unauthorized use of an official credit card.

The accused, identified as a resident of Boralesgamuwa, surrendered to the court through legal representation. After reviewing the case, the magistrate granted bail, setting the condition of two sureties valued at 5 million rupees each.

During the hearing, investigators presented their findings. They reported that the credit card in question, with a 500,000 rupee limit, was linked to personal contact information of the accused. The card was allegedly used for various personal transactions, including payments to a private transport company and a medical professional.

The minister involved had reportedly never received account summaries for this particular credit card, raising further questions about its management and oversight.

The case, which began with a complaint filed by the minister to law enforcement, is scheduled to continue. The next hearing is set for September 27, where further details and developments in the investigation are expected to be presented.

This incident highlights the importance of proper oversight and management of official financial resources, as well as the legal processes involved in addressing such allegations.

Here's a conclusion for the text:

This case underscores the complexities surrounding the use of official financial instruments and the potential for misuse. It raises important questions about accountability, oversight, and the proper handling of government-issued credit cards. As the legal process unfolds, it may prompt a broader discussion on the need for stricter protocols and monitoring systems within government departments. The outcome of this case could potentially influence future policies regarding the management of official financial resources and the responsibilities of those entrusted with their use. As the investigation continues and the case progresses through the judicial system, it serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and integrity in public service.